Saturday, December 14, 2013

The Top 10 of 2013


It was a good year in my little corner of the Internet. Here are my favorite blog posts from 2013:

10. "Tweeters on the Bus" (September 14, 2013). Media critique is something I've come to over time, and this essay on an after-action report of the 2012 Presidential election by CNN reporter Peter Hamby captures many of my frustrations with the media - its odd capacity for ironic distance from the very short comings it creates, its insularity and its unwillingness to take ownership of the fact that, at least at the national level, it does a poor job of informing the public.


9. "Happy Twitterversary" (August 19, 2013). What began for me as a way to pass time while waiting for my then-wife to move out became a community that helped me get through some hard times and allowed me to express myself comfortably, confidently, and most importantly, anonymously. 


8. "In Defense of Don Draper" (May 25, 2013). I love me some Mad Men and nothing brings me greater enjoyment than analyzing the characters of Sterling Cooper & Partners. This blog post from midway through Season 6 will either end up being prescient or moot.


7. "Malaise on the Left" (May 31, 2013). Reduces down, in one blog post, my critique of the President's all-too-often willingness to meet political foes he vanquished more than halfway. 


6. "An Ode to Appetite" (August 3, 2013). Just a fan boy's letter to an album he's known and loved for more than half his life.  


5. "Respectful Infidelity" (August 5, 2013). Sometimes you read something that makes your eyes bleed and sometimes you have to write about that experience (even if the article is click bait for bloggers).


4. "43" (October 19, 2013). The life lessons learned might seem pithy, but they have served me well. 


3. "Elizabeth Wurtzel Has A Sad … Or Something" (February 17, 2013). I can't even with people who reach their 40s and still act like they are in their 20s, particularly when they attempt to make themselves out to be unique snowflakes simply because they refuse to grow up. A fortiori for people who are gifted and talented but choose to squander that ability by navel gazing and embracing their own personal Peter Pan syndrome. 


2. "10 Things I Learned In Therapy" (July 25, 2013). After years of struggling with a lot of "issues" related to oh, the normal stuff people tend to allow to define them, losing someone very important to me (see #1) was the kick in the pants I needed to get some help. I'm happy I did. 


1. "Special Lady Friend" (June 22, 2013). What can you say about a woman who appears out of nowhere, you fall for the minute you meet and, six weeks later pulls out a Glock and empties the chamber into your heart? About 2,200 words worth, apparently. 

Thursday, December 12, 2013

Republicans' Strategic Retreat


Today, the House of Representatives passed a budget to fund the federal government for the fiscal year that started back on October 1st and the next fiscal year. Media types are falling over each other to declare that Speaker John Boehner has finally "had it" with the Tea Party and is asserting his independence from the more radical fringe of his party.

And while I suppose a modest golf clap is in order for our elected officials for having achieved what is essentially the bare minimum of running our government, the passage of a two-year framework has an obvious benefit that is being little reported in the national media - the assurance that there is no government shutdown come October 1, 2014, or roughly 1 month before every member of the House of Representatives and one-third of the Senate are up for re-election. [1] No politician in Washington wants every newscast from Portland, Maine to Portland, Oregon (not to mention every broadcast and cable news channel) leading their newscasts with stories of parks being shut down or workers being kept home. 

What the budget deal does is ensure that incumbents are protected against the one piece of political drama that could seriously affect their chances at re-election. Other pieces of legislation, from immigration reform to gun control have been bottled up in one way or the other and the House is only going to be in session for 98 days before Election Day 2014. The Republicans' main objective next November is simply to retain control of one chamber of Congress, and passing a budget now that avoids any risk of a messy October was the easiest way to do it. Having already locked in 99% of George W. Bush's tax rates, cut domestic spending to its lowest level relative to GDP since the 1950s, and with states gerrymandering Congressional districts in a way that makes it extremely difficult to oust incumbents, winning the Senate would be icing on the cake, but virtually guaranteeing the chances of retaining the House ensures the GOP exactly what it wants - a 2 year struggle leading into 2016 where they can bemoan the dysfunction in Washington they have themselves created.

Follow me on Twitter - @scarylawyerguy

END NOTE

1. Indeed, Majority Leader Cantor's calendar for 2014 shows the House will meet a whopping TWO days in October (the 1st and the 2nd) before adjourning until November 12th! http://majorityleader.gov/Calendar/113thCongressSecondSession.pdf

Saturday, December 7, 2013

Trenton Makes II

Today, I ventured down to the famous "Trenton Makes" [1] Bridge. There's a wide shoulder along Route 29 that allows for good close ups and the bridge itself has a pedestrian walkway and grassy area that offers a nice vantage point for sunset, which occurs over the Delaware River. On a day like today, there were some nice photos to be taken. If you are interested in a high resolution version of any of these photos, email me at scarylawyerguy@gmail.com.

These were taken along Route 29:









These were taken from the side of the bridge looking west toward Pennsylvania: 




END NOTE

Friday, December 6, 2013

Emancipation Day III


There is no owner's manual for moving past divorce. Having committed 17 years to someone, I completely underestimated how long it would take to reconstruct my life. After all, the last time I was single, Bill Clinton had been President for less than a year and Jerry Garcia was still alive. I had no sense of self  outside the context of my marriage. I am still a work in progress, but such a different person than the one who started this journey three years ago. Some lessons learned:

Getting past the anger. I wasn't mad, I was furious; like white hot rage angry about any number of things related to my ex-wife. Stewing in that particular marinade was pretty corrosive. 

Getting past the guilt. Coupled with that was the insane level of guilt I felt about a whole litany of places where I fell well short of decency while I was married. Beating the hell out of myself just exacerbated the pummeling my ex-wife had done to my self-esteem.  

Moving on. Speaking of which, it took me a long time to find the fine line between owning my shit, that is, the part I played in the failure of my marriage and not allowing those shortcomings to define me. I feared intimacy for a long time because I was so wrapped up in that toxic blend of anger and guilt. 

Get into therapy. Stat. For me, divorce was like an emotional car crash requiring intensive rehabilitation. Had I found a well-equipped professional to guide me through the aftermath earlier, some of the things I needed to work through would have happened much sooner. 

Don't attempt to date for at least a year. It baffles me to see people on online dating sites who are not even divorced yet and already "out there." I dated quite a bit immediately after my ex-wife left and the experience was uniformly awful, and not because the women I went out with were bad people, I just was not ready to remotely accept anyone into my life. 

Finding my happy place. The importance of having a creative outlet was an itch I long avoided scratching while I was married because my ex-wife thought such things were dumb. With her no longer around, I came to some things quickly (blogging), others over time (tweeting) and still others more recently (photography). All of these things have brought me great joy. 

Figuring out who the fuck I am. Suffice to say, there was (and is) A LOT of work that I needed to do to get my head right. It happened in fits and starts, often with one step forward and two steps back and finally in a Juliet-detonates-Jughead-at-the-end-of-Season-Five-of-LOST explosion. [1] 

The things I have come to value:

Me. I'm a little quirky - just ask my friends. But what I have come to realize is that I'm not as quirky as I thought I was, that the things that I felt insecure about or lacked in self-confidence were not atypical, but rather, things many people struggle with. I'm also a good friend, son and brother, caring and compassionate, willing to lend an ear or a hand to anyone who is important to me and am quick to forgive. These are not small things. 

Life. Again, When I was married, the situation was so messed up, I rarely looked past that day - there was no next month, year or retirement to contemplate, just getting through that day. Now, I embrace life's rich pageant. 

In sum:

The fact that the one year anniversary of my ex's departure engendered a 3,000+ word post [2] and at the three year anniversary, I'm able to wrap things into a neat little bow at under 700 words says a lot - first and foremost, that it occupies very little space in my life anymore, but also that I've largely processed what I went through, understand where I came up short, have thought, deeply, about the person I am and want to be, and am at a stage in my life where I am ready to welcome someone into this new world - a healthy, nurturing and interesting place that I have made my own. Not a bad trade off for all that hard work and pain.

Follow me on Twitter: @scarylawyerguy

END NOTES


Wednesday, December 4, 2013

The Year In Books


Another great year of book reading is … well, “in the books.” Here’s my list of the (mostly) good stuff I got through:

Book of the Year

Going Clear (Lawrence Wright): Mesmerizing exposé of the Church of Scientology. The first half, which is essentially a condensed biography of founder L. Ron Hubbard, is worth the price of admission, but the second half, which focuses on the Church’s expansive reach into celebrity culture (and its heavy-handed attitude toward naysayers), turns a good book into a superlative one.

Runners-Up

The Unwinding (George Packer): Likely to become the definitive account of the Great Recession.


Dallas 1963 (Bill Minutaglio and Steven Davis): After 50 years, you would think authors would be out of fresh angles to look at the Kennedy Assassination, but you would be wrong. This fascinating look at the right-wing movement in America during JFK’s time has eerie parallels to the odious smears President Obama endures.


Honorable Mention

The Books They Gave Me (Jen Adams): Not weighty enough for consideration as a top-tier book, but in the grand tradition of Important Artifacts (Leanne Shapton), Adams collects short stories of books given to people by family members, loved ones and friends. What you end up with is a tapestry of the bittersweet, mournful and romantic that makes us human.  

Everything Else


What Are You Looking At? (Will Gompertz): Like Art History 101 in a single, highly readable tome. Bonus? Will allow you to spot everything from a Monet to a Hirst from 50 paces away.

On Saudi Arabia (Karen Elliott House): Essential reading for anyone interested in understanding this critical Middle Eastern country.

A Walk in the Woods (Bill Bryson): I found this mid-1990s Bryson story about his attempt to hike the entire Appalachian Trial at a used book sale for 50 cents. As with all things Bryson-ian, it’s granular and easy-to-read, but in this case, the story flagged about half-way through.


Good Prose (Tracy Kidder & Richard Todd): A writer and his long-time editor go Deliverance-dueling-banjoes with tips on improving your writing. Probably should have paid closer attention.

Pound Foolish (Helaine Olen): Insipid prose mixed with bourgeois snootiness for $200, Alex.


Quiet, The Power of Introverts in a World That Can’t Stop Talking (Susan Cain): Deliberative and analytical beats brassy and obnoxious. Got it.

On the Map (Simon Garfield): 2012 Book of the Year (Just My Type) winner Simon Garfield’s follow-up surveys a millennia of map-making. Like Bryson, Garfield’s pointillist style gets you deep in the weeds on arcane subject matter. Highly recommended for the nerd on your holiday list.

Salt, Sugar, Fat (Michael Moss): Confirms everything you would suspect about BIG SNACK – they spend millions and millions of dollars figuring out ways to get you to eat more and more of their unhealthy products in a way that will make you crave more and not feel full. Deeply researched, well written and utterly depressing to anyone who cares about nutrition, healthy eating and fitness.

The Story of English in 100 Words (David Crystal): Once upon a time, new words entered our vernacular sporadically and through fusion with other native tongues. Now, the OED is adding “frenemy” and “selfie” without batting an eyelash. Oh, how times have changed.

The Way of the Knife (Mark Mazzetti): I expected to like this book about our counter-intelligence operations more than I did. The book didn’t tell me a lot I did not already know, but for those not well-versed in our post-9/11 black ops world, you might like it.

1969, The Year Everything Changed (Rob Kirkpatrick): Ended up being part one of a three-part survey I did of the 1970s.


Confessions of a Sociopath, A Life Spent Hiding in Plain Sight (M.E. Thomas): And the award for my least favorite book of the year goes to …

My full review:


1973 Nervous Breakdown (Andreas Killen): Part two of the Me Decade survey.


Banksy, The Man Behind the Wall (Will Ellsworth-Jones): I became a bit of a Banksy enthusiast after seeing his brilliant documentary Exit Through the Gift Shop, but this unauthorized biography doesn’t shed much additional detail on the elusive graffiti artist.

Attached, The New Science of Adult Attachment and How It Can Help You Find and Keep Love (Dr. Amir Levine and Rachel Heller): What happens when you go through a really bad break-up and hope to find some answers in the self-help section of the library.

The Skies Belong To Us (Brendan Koerner): This book has landed on some end-of-the-year “best of” lists and while I enjoyed learning about skyjacking in America in the early 1970s, I did not think it was quite as good as others apparently did.

Lost Girls, An Unsolved American Mystery (Robert Kolker): Ditto for this book about four young women who came from different backgrounds but all met the same fate – trafficking themselves for sex on the Internet and ending up dead on Long Island. In its way, a story of the economic underclass in America and what lengths people will do to escape it.

Difficult Men (Brett Martin): An examination of the rise of the anti-hero (e.g., Tony Soprano, Don Draper, Walter White) in the so-called “Golden Age” of modern TV. If you’re a fan of any of these serious dramas, you will enjoy this behind-the-scenes look at how they came into being and why they are so influential in popular culture.

Strange Rebels (Christian Caryl): In ten years, we went from Nixon’s realpolitik, Brezhnev and Mao to the rise of Khomeini, Thatcher, Deng and Pope John Paul II. The third part of my 1970s journey.


This Town (Mark Leibovich): The “it” book of the summer for the political class. Unironically reveals D.C. at its venal core.


JFK’s Last Hundred Days (Thurston Clarke): Here is another largely fresh take on the Kennedy years by studying the months between the death of JFK’s son Patrick and his assassination in Dallas. Clarke’s book is exhaustively researched and shows a President growing into his job, mastering most of the details and supremely confident about the future, which makes his untimely death all the more tragic.

Lapsing Into A Comma (Bill Walsh): I’m a sucker for a good English usage book.

Yes, I Could Care Less (Bill Walsh): Or two.

One Summer: America 1927 (Bill Bryson): Anything Bryson writes, I will read, but this book, which clocked in at 460 plus pages, felt overlong, particularly because it started out as a lengthy examination of various aviators’ attempts to cross the Atlantic and then devolved into a lot of smaller stories about anything and everything historical/cultural that went down during this time period.

Double Down: Game Change 2012 (Mark Halperin & John Heilemann): Junk food for political obsessives.


Hello, Goodbye, Hello (Craig Brown): A sort of six-degrees-of-separation leitmotif where chance encounters between two famous people link everyone from Hitler to Elvis in pithy, 1,001 word (and not one word longer!) stories.

My full review:







Sunday, December 1, 2013

Book Review - Double Down: Game Change 2012


Mark Halperin and John Heilemann, two of the political class's journalistic princes, have just released a sequel to Game Change, their bestselling account of the 2008 Presidential contest. In  Double Down - Game Change 2012 the two effort to make an otherwise lackluster race compelling, but their breezy narrative is not enough to save this follow-up from falling well short of its predecessor. Whereas the 2008 campaign had narrative to spare - the Obama/Clinton primary, McCain's rising-from-the-ashes run to the GOP nomination, Palin's mercurial rise (and fall), and a Wall Street meltdown less than 2 months before Election Day - a dull-as-dust Mitt Romney is asked to carry most of Double Down, to just the type of mediocre result you would expect. 

While the book starts with an 80 page framing section that re-introduces President Obama roughly two and a half years into his term, he disappears for the next 200, leaving the authors with the thin gruel of what passed for a contest to decide the President's challenger to fill the middle section of their book. What unfolds is the elevation and deflation of a series of anti-Romneys, from Michele Bachmann to Herman Cain and even Donald Trump. Reading this section of Double Down merely serves to underscore what was apparent to anyone who followed the 2012 race closely - Romney was unloved by the establishment and the base alike, with the former trying in vain to recruit an alternative (Mitch Daniels, Chris Christie, Haley Barbour) and the latter shifting their allegiance among various flavors-of-the-month to stop Romney's selection. 

Romney's centrality to the narrative only serves to highlight how flawed he was as a candidate. His hold on the party's nomination was tenuous from the start and, had two of his rivals - Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum - had the financial wherewithal and even a modicum of political savviness - either could have taken Romney out; first, after Gingrich's blowout win in South Carolina and then, after Romney carpet bombed Gingrich into the Stone Age, after Santorum's three state sweep of Minnesota, Missouri and Colorado in early March. That Santorum, whose name is most closely associated with a graphic sex act and who had been drummed out of office by 18 points in 2006, wound up second in the primary fight tells you all you need to know about how weak the other competitors were. That he came close to beating Romney says even more. 

Indeed, the President and his team's surgical dissection of Romney could have been achieved by a halfway competent (and financed) Republican. All of Romney's shortcomings were on display in the primaries - his penchant for sticking his foot in his mouth, his petulance, and inability to connect with the concerns of ordinary Americans - there was simply no one to capitalize on them. In this way, Romney is best seen as an accidental nominee, the beneficiary of a historically weak field of competitors. This fact was apparent to the Obama team, who made a key strategic decision to swarm Romney with negative ads in the late spring and early summer while the Massachusetts Republican was cash strapped and unable to return fire. 

For someone who made his bones as a hyper-efficient CEO, Double Down effectively shows that Romney got the big things and the small things wrong. His failure to cultivate a strong and diverse small donor class bit him when the Obama ad onslaught hit in May and June and he was unable to tap higher dollar contributors who had already maxed out their giving. When the attacks on Romney's time at Bain Capital ensued, the Romney team was, in theory, prepared to respond, having set up a war room months before for just such a purpose, yet, when the first salvos were fired by the Democrats, Team Romney took six days to respond. Romney's unwillingness to release his tax returns only played into the Obama team's hand of painting him as an out-of-touch rich guy and when Romney's team released an ad in must-win Ohio a week before Election Day, the spot blew up in their faces because of its inaccuracies and misrepresentations. Other miscues failed political campaigning 101, from a lack of a coherent speechwriting team (the candidate's acceptance speech wasn't completed until the day of his coronation) to the fact that none of his staff went through a transcript of the President's statement the day after the attack on our consulate in Benghazi, which, had anyone bothered to do so, would have resulted in Romney avoiding getting shivved during the second Presidential debate. 

Other nuggets simply reinforce, to paraphrase Michelle Obama, that running for President does not change who you are, it reveals who you are. In Romney's case, that he was a core-less phony with no political instincts. When a book like Romney's No Apology lands on the New York Times best seller list due to a high volume of bulk sales (a way to artificially inflate the book's popularity), the Times connotes this with a "dagger" symbol next to the book's title. In Romney's case, the volume of bulk sales was so great they used a double dagger. Other instances of Romney's tone deafness will sound more familiar to those who follow politics - his "corporations are people, my friend" riff, offer to bet $10,000 during a Republican debate, and installation of a "car elevator" in his Malibu mansion - all contributed to the public's negative perception of him. But what tied these threads together to sink Romney was the infamous "47 percent" comment he made surreptitiously at a closed-to-the-press fundraiser that did not surface until late in the campaign. In this one unguarded moment, Romney slit his own throat. His clumsy handling of the fallout merely cemented the rest of the narrative - not only was he an out-of-touch plutocrat, but he was running an amateur hour campaign that could not handle crisis communications. 

Left with a desultory general election campaign to report on, Halperin and Heilemann wisely chose to focus on a couple of set pieces - the two nominating conventions and the 1st Presidential debate. As to the former, the Romney camp's incompetence again shone through when they allowed Clint Eastwood on stage without a clue of what he was going to say (to disastrous results) while the President's convention was one home run after the other, surging him into a lead he would never come close to relinquishing except for a few perilous days after Romney's one bright spot occurs at the first Presidential debate. Of course, the impact of that evening is elevated in the book's telling - there is little other drama in the race - but for all the insider scoop that is offered, of Obama's self-doubt in the wake of that loss (splashed conveniently on the cover of New York magazine, where Heilemann is a reporter), the sleepless nights of debate prep, and even the inclusion of the verbatim "debate-on-a-page" talking points the President deployed, it all feels like much ado about nothing. Obama knee capped Romney with his "Please proceed, Governor" comment on Benghazi in the second debate and in the third, Obama pummeled a spooked Romney (unsurprisingly, the authors mention this last contest only in passing). Indeed, most polling conducted at the time suggested the tightening in the race that Romney's performance in Denver created had largely dissipated less than 10 days later. 

While the authors attempt to inject drama into those final weeks of the campaign, not only was there little actual movement in the polling, but the size and scope of Obama's victory was such that he could have lost Ohio and Pennsylvania and still won, which would have been the first time that happened since 1960. Indeed, the race's one media star, Nate Silver, is never referenced in the book, perhaps not a surprising omission in light of the fact that for all the sturm und drang that people like Halperin and Heilemann need to earn their living, it was Silver who nailed the electoral vote in all 50 states while pundits were fulminating about crowd counts, lawn signs and phantom late surges that never appeared. Little is said about the abject failure of Romney's own polling or get out the vote operations, both of which failed miserably while Obama's ran like well-oiled machines. And the book's post-mortem, which discusses the "coalition of the ascendent" that Obama re-cobbled together to win, feels out of context considering the authors spent no time discussing why it was that Romney got beaten so thoroughly among African-Americans, Hispanic-Americans, women and young people. 

Of course, Halperin and Heilemann don't "do" policy in that way. People pay to read about intemperate remarks politicians make about one another in private (and there are plenty of those in the book), and as a "dishy" account of inside-the-Beltway drama, Double Down is without peer. Every petty rivalry, unguarded thought, and candidate insecurity is dutifully recorded, but aside from feeding the maw of inside-the-Beltway cable chatter and preaching to the choir of fellow reporters, D.C. lobbyists and political lifers in the nation's capital, the book has the weight of cotton candy. Odious statements by people like Richard Mourdock and Todd Akin are reported on through the campaign lens - of the harm they did to Romney - instead of what they were - reflective of a Republican party growing ever more hostile towards women's rights (nothing is said of the numerous state-level Voter ID laws that disproportionately impacted minority voters). Page after page pours forth about Joe Biden's propensity for gaffes, but meanwhile, the Veep is in on every major decision from the Recovery Act to withdrawing from Iraq and drawing down from Afghanistan. The authors gin up a lot of heat between Presidents Obama and Clinton, but the latter essentially steps into the former's shoes once Hurricane Sandy hits, doing more than twenty events in less than a week. 

As fluff, Double Down is as satisfying as Stay-Puft, but the sugar rush is fleeting. This is a book written by D.C. insiders for D.C. insiders and those of us who press our noses up against the window to peek inside to see how venal, trivial and small-minded our elected officials, their factotums and those who report on (and are part of) what Halperin and Heilemann call (without irony) "the freak show" act. In this respect, Double Down is a runaway success.





Saturday, November 30, 2013

Colonial Lake

This morning, I got up before sunrise to make a trip down to Colonial Lake in Lawrenceville. While the lake itself did not provide much in the way of good imagery, the denuded maple trees and crescent moon more than made up for it. 







John Heinz Wildlife Refuge at Tinicum

Last Sunday was bitterly cold, but I braved the elements and trucked down to the Heinz Wildlife Refuge [1] just south of Philadelphia. I was hoping to see some wildlife, but I think it was too cold, even for them. I will definitely be making a return visit when the weather warms up. Anyway, the marsh and creek along the trail I walked provided much of the scenery. Here's what I saw:







1. http://www.fws.gov/refuge/John_Heinz/

Thursday, November 21, 2013

Harry Reid Goes Nuclear


Today, Senate Democrats passed a rule in the Senate curtailing the use of the filibuster for cabinet nominees and non-Supreme Court judicial appointees. While long overdue and aside from whatever credence one wants to give to changing the “norms” of an institution like the U.S. Senate, the one argument that kept (and keeps) some from supporting this long overdue action is the idea that Republicans will one day again control both the White House and the Senate and Democrats will rue the day they removed a tool they might want to stop a radical appointee to head, say the Environmental Protection Agency or be appointed to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals.

To them I say, the existence of the filibuster did little to stop such appointments in the past. John Ashcroft, who famously draped “Lady Liberty” to cover an exposed breast was confirmed and served as U.S. Attorney General for four years. Other ignoble names from the past, from James Watt to Janice Rogers Brown, made it through the confirmation process even though their politics were well to the right of mainstream thought. Moreover, the idea that Republicans would not change the filibuster rules in the future, regardless, always struck me as specious. After all, they used reconciliation to get massive tax cuts through and threatened to do what Reid did today just eight years ago.

The judiciary, in particular, tends to find its balance because the number of appointees by Presidents of each party hovers close to par over time. That the Democrats have held the White House for more time than Republicans over the last 20 years should result in a judiciary that tilts more to the left and when vacancies arise, regardless of the court, nominees, barring some disqualifying justification, should be given an up or down vote. Over the long run, a Patricia Owen will be balanced out by a Patricia Millett. It is part of the genius of the Constitution Republicans claim to so revere that this occurs.

Of course, none of this took place in a vacuum. As others have noted, the level of GOP obstruction under Obama has been unprecedented. Nearly half (46%) of all judicial appointment filibusters since 1968 have occurred during his presidency[1] and never-before actions, such as the filibustering of multiple cabinet appointees (Defense, Labor, EPA, and CIA) occurred this year alone. That it took Senator Reid this long to finally “push the button” speaks for more loudly about his respect for the Senate as an institution than his eagerness to c


[1] http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/senate-democrats-threaten-to-change-filibuster-rules-on-a-party-line-vote/2013/11/21/4c41f58a-5260-11e3-9fe0-fd2ca728e67c_story.html?hpid=z1

Monday, November 18, 2013

The Calm After The Storm

A big storm blew through New Jersey Sunday night. When day broke, the sky was particularly blue and the clouds were moving swiftly across the horizon. I didn't have to venture any further than my backyard to capture these beautiful images. Enjoy!