Just in time to save the media
industrial complex, two scandal-scarred politicians, Anthony Weiner and Eliot
Spitzer, jumped into races for New York City Mayor and New York City
Comptroller (respectively). Naturally, the media pounced (does it do any other
action verb in situations like this?). Much ink was spilled over the temerity
of these two men to run for elective office. The former, brought down low by a
bizarre Twitter scandal involving semi-chaste ‘sexting’ type behavior; the
latter, an actual law breaker who paid money for sex (but kept his socks on, in
case you were wondering) have both been adjudged by some in the media as
unworthy of the public’s trust and while that may well be the case, I don’t
recall anyone nominating the media to be the arbiter of propriety when it comes
to who we pick to represent us.
Indeed, the negative reaction to Weiner
and Spitzer belies a larger issue at work in today’s journalistic circles – its
inclination toward lowest common denominator reporting that feels like some
combination of Mean Girls and school
marm. Reporters are entitled to their opinions, but unless those are being
expressed on the opinion page of
their newspaper or website, the citizenry is perfectly capable of (and indeed,
constitutionally designated) choosing people to represent them. In fact,
because of the comprehensive reporting done of these scandals when they
happened, it is impossible to think that voters in New York City are unaware of
the actions of these two men and have (and will) factor that behavior in to
deciding whether or not to vote for either candidate.
Short of some legal impediment that bars
a person from running for office, the media is best served by sticking to the
candidates’ positions on issues and avoiding substituting their own morality
for that of the electorate. Surely, in a country where voters are getting
disenfranchised at the state level, abortion rights are being restricted, and our
economy continues to limp through a tepid recovery, there are more important
things to focus on than WeinerSpitzer.
Reporters have an obligation to report the facts of the story and can do so without opinions, but it's good to have an informed electorate.
ReplyDelete